Case IH Power Tab

Farm Futures
   Search Site:   Saturday, May 26, 2012 | Bookmark This Site   
Skip Navigation Links
Home
Markets
News
Weather
Farm Futures NOW!
Magazine Online
RSS News
Land For Sale
Mobile
Subscribe
Reprints
Register
Login
About Us
Advertise
 
Share This
 

Senators Are Pressing for Approval of XL Pipeline

Congress argues that national needs should be placed ahead of November re-elections.
Compiled by staff 
Published: Feb 3, 2012

Senate Republicans joined by one Democrat launched a bid this week to overturn President Obama's decision to delay approval of the Keystone XL Pipeline from Canada.

Republicans and Democrat Joe Manchin of West Virginia are not giving up on the XL Pipeline, pressing a bill to approve the XL permit over the President's objections by using Congressional authority over foreign commerce.

Senator and former USDA Secretary Mike Johanns, R-Neb., argues all of Obama's objections, including Nebraska re-routing around a sensitive aquifer, have been addressed.

"TransCanada agreed that they would work to reroute the pipeline through our state; everyone shook hands," Johanns said. "We are now in agreement; our problem is solved in Nebraska. For months and months the Federal government has been saying to the state of Nebraska you have the power to route this pipeline through your state and that is exactly what we are doing."

Johanns argues no one was contesting any other part of the $7 billion, 1,700 mile pipeline that could deliver as much as 500,000 barrels of oil a day to the U.S.

"What is holding that up? What could be possibly holding that up," Johanns said. "The simple answer to that question is the President of the United States is holding it up, he's in a bind. The environmentalists have declared war on the oil sands in Canada. They don't want the pipeline because they don't want the oil sands. On the other hand the unions want to build the pipeline, they want the jobs."

Johanns argues Washington needs to put national interests ahead of November re-election politics. The Senate bill has 44 co-sponsors.

Senator John Thune, R-S.D., answered the administration's claims the pipeline needs more study after three years-plus of review.

"What's interesting to me about this particular project is the 1,200 days longer than any pipeline of this magnitude, extended review of more than 10,000 pages of environmental analysis concluded that the pipeline will not adversely impact the environment."

Thune cited an Energy Department finding that gas prices in regions served by East Coast and Gulf Coast refineries, including the Midwest, would decrease with the pipeline. Similar legislation is pending in the House.



Permalink: Click here

Tagged: usda

Comments
Read comments from others and share your own thoughts.
Please provide the answer to the following question:

 = 
Why should we suck North America dry. It's good for America to use up the oil in other regions of the world, $4 gas is cheap. The more we empty everyone else's reserves, the more we will have power over them in the future. Lets keep our oil safe in the ground and ready for the next global war because will need it.
Posted by Anonymous on March 9 at 6:29 PM
Help! We need jobs. We need property tax relief. It is a shevel ready job. Even if all the jobs are imported they will need living expenses. We have a pipeline on our property and there have been no leaks in the last 50 years. Lets have progress and stop trying projects like wind farms and ethanol that don't work and cost money. Lets get real. from Montana
Posted by Anonymous on February 13 at 5:58 PM
Why do you care if the oil is exported? The us will tax it.
Posted by Anonymous on February 12 at 8:13 PM
Once again, what a bunch of hooey or what ever. Ask the people of Nebraska how they like the pipeline idea. Oil companies will destroy life as we know it.
Posted by Anonymous on February 10 at 10:03 PM
Research has proven that more CO2 makes weeds grow better than it does crops. US short on refining capacity? Then how come currently 40% of the diesel fuel refined in the US is being exported to Europe? That's why our diesel is so expensive.
Posted by Anonymous on February 9 at 3:44 PM
the oil in Canada and in the northern part of the States must get to the refineries, one day before to many years go by the US will once again be oil independent but the good Ole USA doesn't have enough refining capacity to handle all of the oil required to make fuels those now the price of fuels is higher than it should be; bring more oil to the south will improve capacity for refining because without more US supplies more refining will go off shore where the enviros don't have any influence, smarter to keep it in the USA and keep it clean. Besides all farmers know more CO2 makes crops grow better and it is a naturally occuring thing, not a bad thing.
Posted by Anonymous on February 9 at 11:14 AM
When the Republicans use the figure of 20,000 jobs from the XL their figures come from using shovels to dig the ditch.
Posted by Anonymous on February 9 at 10:24 AM
Why build a pipline to export the oil and US expense for a foreign oil compnay? A refinery in the North would create permanent jobs instead of temp jobs during consruction. Why should the US foot the bill? If Trans Canada wants it let them pay for it. I would like a new John Deere combone. It would create manufacturing jobs, with a new combine I would need more help so that means more jobs. The increase in grain would l;ower food costs. See everyone wins. Come on Congress GET REAL na ddo your job. Work for the US!
Posted by Anonymous on February 9 at 9:52 AM
Now I understand why they don't build a refinery in Canada or Upper United States. The oil is for export! If it is to be used for U.S. consumption, why pump it all the way to the south then have to truck it all the way back north again.
Posted by Anonymous on February 9 at 7:49 AM
What an absolute bunch of hooey. It has not mattered one little bit, all the things that have been done to save "WE THE PEOPLE" on fuel cost. This pipeline will only create jobs for a very limited few, who will actually travel with it. So as far as jobs all over the place, not going to happen. It will be just like the wind mills. They brought in crews to do all the work, yea, spent a bit a cash, but did anyone here, benefit with work, high wages? Nah, not one person. Now, these elected officials, feel that they have the right to go around the president? I guess it really is to much to ask that our government, take a big step back, and think about "WE THE PEOPLE" instead of their own personal wallet and bank account balance. It is so disgusting to watch our elected officials.
Posted by Anonymous on February 9 at 7:21 AM
I dont have a problem with the pipeline ,its the truth that republicans wont tell you,this oil is not going to stay in the states its going on the world market, may the bidding begin!!!!!
Posted by Anonymous on February 9 at 6:08 AM
throw the infidel out of office
Posted by Anonymous on February 9 at 5:28 AM
 
Search this site:   

Read More Stories
USDA Seeks Comment on Report Timing
Read this storyWith new market hours,USDA is looking into the right time to release information to the market.
Read this story

Weekend Forecast Changes Pivotal for Grain Futures
Read this storyEurope remains a concern, but the big driver on Tuesday will likely be the state of next week’s anticipated Midwest rains.
Read this story

Farm Markets Rise Ahead of Holiday
Read this storyOvernight boost based on positive comments from Europe aimed at pressuring Germany.
Read this story

 
USDA Seeks Comment on Report Timing
Afternoon Recap by Arlan Suderman
Weekend Forecast Changes Pivotal for Grain Futures
The Buzz: Grain Market Chaos Continues
Weekly Fertilizer Review
Morning Call by Bryce Knorr
Satellite Imagery Shows the Good and the Bad
CRP Signup Results Announced
Farm Markets Rise Ahead of Holiday
Livestock Call By John Otte
Top 50 Tags
4-H afternoon recap American Farm Bureau Federation American Soybean Association animal health arlan suderman biodiesel biofuels bryce knorr BSE Bushel checkoff cotton Drought Environmental Protection Agency EPA ethanol Extension extension service farm farm bill Farm Bureau farm futures farm futures magazine farm futures market farm progress Farm Service Agency farmfutures farmfutures.com farming farmprogress.com fertilizer FFA free trade agreement Harvest insurance labor legal National Cattlemen's Beef Association National Corn Growers Association NCGA soybean soybean association soybeans SURE usda wheat winter wheat www.farmfutures www.farmfutures.com