Case IH Power Tab

Farm Futures
   Search Site:   Saturday, May 26, 2012 | Bookmark This Site   
Skip Navigation Links
Home
Markets
News
Weather
Farm Futures NOW!
Magazine Online
RSS News
Land For Sale
Mobile
Subscribe
Reprints
Register
Login
About Us
Advertise
 
Share This
 

Most Farms Would Be Worse Off Under Waxman-Markey

Chambliss is asking for further hearings on global warming.
Compiled by staff 
Published: Sep 8, 2009

Senator Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., has reiterated his call for additional hearings on comprehensive global warming legislation. A study which was performed at the request of the Senator examined 98 representative farms to understand the farm gate implications of the House-passed American Clean Energy and Security Act. That study revealed that 71 of the operations would be worse off under the bill.

 

Nearly all of the 27 farming operations that realize benefits under the Waxman-Markey bill are located in the Midwest Corn Belt. The study indicates the benefits are predominantly the result of increased revenue from higher prices, a result of fewer acres planted to these crops, not from payments under an offset program. In other words, Chambliss says, geographic disparities would exist as a result of the Waxman-Markey bill.

 

Virtually all cotton and dairy operations would be worse off and no rice farms or cattle ranches would experience any benefit under the bill. Chambliss charges that this is in direct contrast to what Ag Secretary Tom Vilsack said while testifying before the Senate Agriculture Committee hearing in July, at which he stated that all agriculture would benefit from this plan.

 

The study was conducted by The Agriculture & Food Policy Center at Texas A&M University. According to Chambliss the data outlined in the study is troubling. Particularly the cap and trade program, which will undoubtedly raise production costs for farmers and ranchers. Perhaps most troubling to Chambliss is that the Waxman-Markey bill will result in more than 7 million acres shifting out of production in the first 5 years, with nearly 50 million acres by 2050.

Permalink: Click here

Tagged: farm, cotton, farming, Corn Belt, ranches

Comments
Read comments from others and share your own thoughts.
Please provide the answer to the following question:

 = 
 
Search this site:   

Read More Stories
USDA Seeks Comment on Report Timing
Read this storyWith new market hours,USDA is looking into the right time to release information to the market.
Read this story

Weekend Forecast Changes Pivotal for Grain Futures
Read this storyEurope remains a concern, but the big driver on Tuesday will likely be the state of next week’s anticipated Midwest rains.
Read this story

Farm Markets Rise Ahead of Holiday
Read this storyOvernight boost based on positive comments from Europe aimed at pressuring Germany.
Read this story

 
USDA Seeks Comment on Report Timing
Afternoon Recap by Arlan Suderman
Weekend Forecast Changes Pivotal for Grain Futures
The Buzz: Grain Market Chaos Continues
Morning Call by Bryce Knorr
CRP Signup Results Announced
Satellite Imagery Shows the Good and the Bad
Farm Markets Rise Ahead of Holiday
Weekly Fertilizer Review
Livestock Call By John Otte
Top 50 Tags
4-H afternoon recap American Farm Bureau Federation American Soybean Association animal health arlan suderman biodiesel biofuels bryce knorr BSE Bushel checkoff cotton Drought Environmental Protection Agency EPA ethanol Extension extension service farm farm bill Farm Bureau farm futures farm futures magazine farm futures market farm progress Farm Service Agency farmfutures farmfutures.com farming farmprogress.com fertilizer FFA free trade agreement Harvest insurance labor legal National Cattlemen's Beef Association National Corn Growers Association NCGA soybean soybean association soybeans SURE usda wheat winter wheat www.farmfutures www.farmfutures.com