Case IH Power Tab

Farm Futures
   Search Site:   Saturday, May 26, 2012 | Bookmark This Site   
Skip Navigation Links
Home
Markets
News
Weather
Farm Futures NOW!
Magazine Online
RSS News
Land For Sale
Mobile
Subscribe
Reprints
Register
Login
About Us
Advertise
 
Share This
 

Letter to Energy Committee Outlines Potential Problems with Climate Legislation

NCGA concerned with contents of climate change bill.
Compiled by staff 
Published: May 18, 2009

The American Clean Energy and Security Act was introduced in the House last week and the National Corn Growers are concerned with the contents of the bill. NCGA sent a letter to Representative Henry Waxman, D-Calif., Chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. The letter questioned the current version, and outlined the potential for negative economic impacts to the agriculture sector if a cap-and-trade system is not structured properly.

"After reviewing the legislation, we can see the bill does not clearly provide for a mechanism by which corn growers can sell carbon credits on the market," NCGA President Bob Dickey said.  "We strongly believe the bill will increase input costs without specific opportunities to offset those additions.  We cannot support the American Clean Energy and Security Act in absence of the provisions that we have explained in some length to the Committee." 

Recognizing the wide range of carbon mitigation or sequestration benefits that agriculture can provide is one of the most important principles for any cap-and-trade legislation.  This would allow farmers to earn the potential revenue from carbon sequestration trading to offset increased input costs of such items as diesel, fertilizer and steel. Currently agricultural offsets are not mentioned in the legislation. 

"In recent years, our grower members have seen increasingly higher input costs," Dickey said.  "Each year, growers must commit even more funds to put a crop in the ground and it would be beneficial to have the opportunity to generate revenue from greenhouse gas reduction practices. Our organization has met with several Members of the Energy and Commerce Committee and we fully appreciate their willingness to sit down and work with us on important issue.  However, we cannot support this legislation in its current form."

Permalink: Click here

Tagged: input costs, NCGA, fertilizer

Comments
Read comments from others and share your own thoughts.
Please provide the answer to the following question:

 = 
 
Search this site:   

Read More Stories
USDA Seeks Comment on Report Timing
Read this storyWith new market hours,USDA is looking into the right time to release information to the market.
Read this story

Weekend Forecast Changes Pivotal for Grain Futures
Read this storyEurope remains a concern, but the big driver on Tuesday will likely be the state of next week’s anticipated Midwest rains.
Read this story

Farm Markets Rise Ahead of Holiday
Read this storyOvernight boost based on positive comments from Europe aimed at pressuring Germany.
Read this story

 
USDA Seeks Comment on Report Timing
Afternoon Recap by Arlan Suderman
Weekend Forecast Changes Pivotal for Grain Futures
The Buzz: Grain Market Chaos Continues
Morning Call by Bryce Knorr
CRP Signup Results Announced
Satellite Imagery Shows the Good and the Bad
Farm Markets Rise Ahead of Holiday
Weekly Fertilizer Review
Livestock Call By John Otte
Top 50 Tags
4-H afternoon recap American Farm Bureau Federation American Soybean Association animal health arlan suderman biodiesel biofuels bryce knorr BSE Bushel checkoff cotton Drought Environmental Protection Agency EPA ethanol Extension extension service farm farm bill Farm Bureau farm futures farm futures magazine farm futures market farm progress Farm Service Agency farmfutures farmfutures.com farming farmprogress.com fertilizer FFA free trade agreement Harvest insurance labor legal National Cattlemen's Beef Association National Corn Growers Association NCGA soybean soybean association soybeans SURE usda wheat winter wheat www.farmfutures www.farmfutures.com