Case IH Power Tab

Farm Futures
   Search Site:   Saturday, May 26, 2012 | Bookmark This Site   
Skip Navigation Links
Home
Markets
News
Weather
Farm Futures NOW!
Magazine Online
RSS News
Land For Sale
Mobile
Subscribe
Reprints
Register
Login
About Us
Advertise
 
Share This
 

House Members Press Forward with Effort to Stop EPA Regulation of Farm Dust

Despite EPA statement of no change and Senate bill being dropped, one year moratorium being advanced.
Compiled by staff 
Published: Nov 2, 2011

Representative Kristi Noem, R-S.D., and 112 House co-sponsors have introduced legislation to prevent the Environmental Protection Agency from regulating dust.  That's despite Administrator Lisa Jackson's public statement that the agency has no intention of regulating rural dust.  During a recent House subcommittee hearing, Noem spoke in support of HR 1633.

"This bill would insure that the EPA does not increase their standards for a year, which brings some certainty to the agriculture industry," Noem said. "And then there is a second component that actually defines nuisance dust that encapsulates farm dust, which right now is not defined within the statute and proves the difference between the two and that they need to be treated separately from what urban dust is. Urban dust is stuff that you would find in a city that has been proven to have detrimental health effects. The course particulate matter defined as farm dust has no scientific data that it is harmful."

Noem says her proposal prevents tighter regulations on particulate matter for one year from the date of enactment.  She says the legislation is still needed, as EPA is currently conducting a review of the standard and could finalize something different from the proposed PM10 standard.

"Anything could make that change, she could decide tomorrow that she wants to move to that kind of a change," Noem said. "Or a lawsuit could come up or some kind of litigation that would prompt the EPA to change its mind. I truly believe and a hundred other co-sponsors on the House side believe that the certainty agriculture needs is we are not going to change this for a year; the EPA cannot change it at all."

The fate of Noem's proposal is unclear. Companion legislation in the Senate was dropped after receiving EPA assurance they wouldn't impose stricter rules.



Permalink: Click here

Tagged: EPA, farm, Environmental Protection Agency

Comments
Read comments from others and share your own thoughts.
Please provide the answer to the following question:

 = 
 
Search this site:   

Read More Stories
USDA Seeks Comment on Report Timing
Read this storyWith new market hours,USDA is looking into the right time to release information to the market.
Read this story

CME Group Alters Hours…Again
Read this storyAs it settles into the new 21-hour trading day, open outcry pit hours will change on key USDA report days. And KC Board of Trade matches move.
Read this story

CRP Signup Results Announced
Read this storyUSDA reports interest is high in the 26-year-old program.
Read this story

 
USDA Seeks Comment on Report Timing
Afternoon Recap by Arlan Suderman
Weekend Forecast Changes Pivotal for Grain Futures
The Buzz: Grain Market Chaos Continues
Morning Call by Bryce Knorr
CRP Signup Results Announced
Satellite Imagery Shows the Good and the Bad
Farm Markets Rise Ahead of Holiday
Livestock Call By John Otte
Weekly Fertilizer Review
Top 50 Tags
4-H afternoon recap American Farm Bureau Federation American Soybean Association animal health arlan suderman biodiesel biofuels bryce knorr BSE Bushel checkoff cotton Drought Environmental Protection Agency EPA ethanol Extension extension service farm farm bill Farm Bureau farm futures farm futures magazine farm futures market farm progress Farm Service Agency farmfutures farmfutures.com farming farmprogress.com fertilizer FFA free trade agreement Harvest insurance labor legal National Cattlemen's Beef Association National Corn Growers Association NCGA soybean soybean association soybeans SURE usda wheat winter wheat www.farmfutures www.farmfutures.com