Case IH Power Tab

Farm Futures
   Search Site:   Saturday, May 26, 2012 | Bookmark This Site   
Skip Navigation Links
Home
Markets
News
Weather
Farm Futures NOW!
Magazine Online
RSS News
Land For Sale
Mobile
Subscribe
Reprints
Register
Login
About Us
Advertise
 
Share This
 

Farm Bureau Petitions Supreme Court in Pesticide Case

Ruling could affect hundreds of thousands of farmers.
Compiled by staff 
Published: Nov 3, 2009

The American Farm Bureau Federation has filed a petition with the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the high court to review a lower court ruling that will otherwise impose Clean Water Act permitting requirements on the application of pesticides on, over or near water. The Sixth Circuit found in National Cotton Council v. EPA that EPA must require Clean Water Act permits under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System for pesticide application in water or near waters where pesticide falls into the water. The court recognized only a very narrow exception for chemical pesticides intentionally applied to water that leave no "residue" after their use is complete.

"Allowing the lower court ruling to stand would pose serious challenges to farmers battling pests," said AFBF President Bob Stallman. "When pests strike, time is of the essence, and any length of time waiting for permit approval for products that are already approved would be disastrous."

 

In its petition, AFBF argues that the EPA pesticide rule simply formalized how EPA and Congress have always addressed environmental regulation of pesticide use.

 

"Since Congress enacted the Clean Water Act in 1972, EPA has never subjected the use of pesticides to NPDES permitting," said Julie Anna Potts, the AFBF's general counsel. "This court opinion dramatically changes the scope of the Clean Water Act and will force farmers, public health agencies, and many others into burdensome, time-consuming, and costly permitting requirements that could seriously impair their ability to use pesticides to protect croplands and public health."

 

If the decision is allowed to stand, farmers and others who use pesticides, such as mosquito abatement districts, will be required to obtain permits in order to apply pesticides on or near water. Since EPA views "waters of the United States" very broadly, including wetlands and even some ditches, the decision could affect hundreds of thousands of farmers.



Permalink: Click here

Tagged: EPA, pesticide, farm, Farm Bureau, cotton

Comments
Read comments from others and share your own thoughts.
Please provide the answer to the following question:

 = 
 
Search this site:   

Read More Stories
USDA Seeks Comment on Report Timing
Read this storyWith new market hours,USDA is looking into the right time to release information to the market.
Read this story

Weekend Forecast Changes Pivotal for Grain Futures
Read this storyEurope remains a concern, but the big driver on Tuesday will likely be the state of next week’s anticipated Midwest rains.
Read this story

Farm Markets Rise Ahead of Holiday
Read this storyOvernight boost based on positive comments from Europe aimed at pressuring Germany.
Read this story

 
USDA Seeks Comment on Report Timing
Afternoon Recap by Arlan Suderman
Morning Call by Bryce Knorr
Weekend Forecast Changes Pivotal for Grain Futures
Farm Markets Rise Ahead of Holiday
Satellite Imagery Shows the Good and the Bad
Top 50 Tags
4-H afternoon recap American Farm Bureau Federation American Soybean Association animal health arlan suderman biodiesel biofuels bryce knorr BSE Bushel checkoff cotton Drought Environmental Protection Agency EPA ethanol Extension extension service farm farm bill Farm Bureau farm futures farm futures magazine farm futures market farm progress Farm Service Agency farmfutures farmfutures.com farming farmprogress.com fertilizer FFA free trade agreement Harvest insurance labor legal National Cattlemen's Beef Association National Corn Growers Association NCGA soybean soybean association soybeans SURE usda wheat winter wheat www.farmfutures www.farmfutures.com