Case IH Power Tab

Farm Futures
   Search Site:   Friday, May 25, 2012 | Bookmark This Site   
Skip Navigation Links
Home
Markets
News
Weather
Farm Futures NOW!
Magazine Online
RSS News
Land For Sale
Mobile
Subscribe
Reprints
Register
Login
About Us
Advertise
 
Share This
 

Climate Change Markup Boycotted by Republican Senators

Republicans seek analysis of climate bill.
Compiled by staff 
Published: Nov 3, 2009

Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., Chairwoman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, wants to begin markup of the Senate's climate change bill Tuesday. But to do so, she will have to follow alternate rules. The problem she faces is that Republicans on the committee say they will not be present. Two members of the minority party must attend in order for a markup to proceed, under standard rules. But, under alternate rules, with a 12-7 majority favoring Democrats, Boxer does not need Republican's support to report the bill favorably.

 

According to Senate spokesman Matt Dempsey all seven Republicans on the EPW committee will not attend if Boxer pushes forward with a markup. Boxer is hoping Republicans on her committee will rethink their approach. She says as long as they refuse to come to work, they are not participating in one of the most important issues facing our generation. Boxer is leaving to door open for them to change their decision.

 

Meanwhile, all six ranking Republicans of the Senate committees with jurisdiction over portions of the Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act have called for an analysis of the bill. They want to see a full accounting of the bill's projected impact on the nation's economy. That study has yet to be completed.

 

Senators Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, James Inhofe, R-Okla., Richard Lugar, R-Ind., and Kay Hutchison, R-Texas co-signed a letter to Boxer with their request. They wrote, "We are deeply troubled by the failure to accommodate a request from Republicans for a complete analysis of the bill's projected impacts on the nation."

 

The letter continued that while such analyses are never perfect, they are an essential aspect of the legislative decision-making process when policy changes of such consequence are in play, and these analyses are worth the time and resources required to not only get them done, but to get them done right.



Permalink: Click here

Tagged: accounting

Comments
Read comments from others and share your own thoughts.
Please provide the answer to the following question:

 = 
 
Search this site:   

Read More Stories
Farm Markets Rise Ahead of Holiday
Read this storyOvernight boost based on positive comments from Europe aimed at pressuring Germany.
Read this story

CME Group Alters Hours…Again
Read this storyIn a reactionary move as it settles into new trading approach, open outcry pit hours will change on key USDA report days.
Read this story

CRP Signup Results Announced
Read this storyUSDA reports interest is high in the 26-year-old program.
Read this story

 
Morning Call by Bryce Knorr
Livestock Call By John Otte
Satellite Imagery Shows the Good and the Bad
Farm Markets Rise Ahead of Holiday
CME Group Alters Hours…Again
The Buzz: Grain Market Chaos Continues
Farm Bill Heads for Senate Floor
Afternoon Recap by Arlan Suderman
Settlement Offered in Atrazine Herbicide Case
MF Global Friday: Exec Pay Surprise
Top 50 Tags
4-H afternoon recap American Farm Bureau Federation American Soybean Association animal health arlan suderman biodiesel biofuels bryce knorr BSE Bushel checkoff cotton Drought Environmental Protection Agency EPA ethanol Extension extension service farm farm bill Farm Bureau farm futures farm futures magazine farm futures market farm progress Farm Service Agency farmfutures farmfutures.com farming farmprogress.com fertilizer FFA free trade agreement Harvest insurance labor legal National Cattlemen's Beef Association National Corn Growers Association NCGA soybean soybean association soybeans SURE usda wheat winter wheat www.farmfutures www.farmfutures.com