Case IH Power Tab

Farm Futures
   Search Site:   Friday, May 25, 2012 | Bookmark This Site   
Skip Navigation Links
Home
Markets
News
Weather
Farm Futures NOW!
Magazine Online
RSS News
Land For Sale
Mobile
Subscribe
Reprints
Register
Login
About Us
Advertise
 
Share This
 

Biotech Crops Reduce Pesticide Use, Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Planting of these crops generates additional $27.5 billion in global farm income.

Compiled by staff 
Published: Oct 11, 2005

After just nine years of commercialization, biotech crops have made a significant, positive impact on the global economy and environment, decreasing pesticide spraying and reducing the environmental footprint associated with pesticide use by 14%, according to a study released Tuesday.

"Since 1996, adoption of biotech crops has contributed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture and decreased pesticide spraying," says Graham Brookes, director of PG Economics, and one of the authors who conducted the study. "While greatly enhancing the way farmers in 18 countries produce food, feed and fiber, biotech crops have reduced the environmental footprint associated with agricultural practices. This study offers the first quantifiable global look at the impact of biotech crop production."

The study, "GM crops: the global socio-economic and environmental impact -- the first nine years 1996—2004," reported that biotech crops contributed to significantly reduced greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural practices. This reduction results from decreased fuel use, about 475 million gallons in the past nine years, and additional soil carbon sequestration because of reduced plowing or improved conservation tillage associated with biotech crops. In 2004, this reduction was equivalent to eliminating more than 22 billion pounds of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, or removing 5 million cars -- one-fifth of cars registered in the United Kingdom -- from the road for one year.

Biotech crops have reduced the volume of pesticide spraying globally by 6% since 1996, equivalent to a decrease of 380 million pounds according to the study. That's equivalent to eliminating 1,514 rail cars of pesticide's active ingredient. The largest environmental gains from changes in pesticide spraying have been from biotech soybeans and cotton, which have reduced the associated environmental footprint by 19% and 17%, respectively.

According to the study, the industrialized nations of the United States and Canada, as well as the developing nations of China, South Africa and Argentina, experienced the greatest reductions in the environmental impact of crop production.

"As the world is increasingly focused on the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, it is clear biotech crops are already making an important positive contribution to achieving this goal," Brookes says.

In addition to environmental gains from biotech crops, substantial net economic benefits at the farm level have been realized. Since 1996, global farm income has increased by a cumulative total of $27 billion, derived from a combination of enhanced productivity and efficiency gains. This increase in farm income is equivalent to adding 3% to 4% to the value of global production of the four main biotech crops. Herbicide-tolerant soybeans have generated the greatest gains at more than $17 billion in increased income, while biotech cotton farmers improved their income by $6.5 billion in the past nine years.

Growers in the United States and Argentina have reaped the greatest rewards, each gaining approximately $10 billion in the past nine years, while farmers in China have experienced a $4 billion income increase from planting biotech cotton.

In addition to the significant measurable benefits, valuable indirect benefits that are more difficult to quantify can be credited to biotech crop adoption. These include increased management flexibility, facilitating reduced tillage practices, reduced production risk and improved crop quality.

More than 8.25 million farmers in 18 countries around the world have adopted biotech crops, and 90% of those are resource-poor producers located in developing countries.



Permalink: Click here

Tagged: pesticide, farm, cotton, soybeans, tillage

Comments
Read comments from others and share your own thoughts.
Please provide the answer to the following question:

 = 
 
Search this site:   

Read More Stories
Satellite Imagery Shows the Good and the Bad
Read this storyMany crop areas are doing better than normal, but a few problem areas are beginning to show up as well including the winter wheat crop.
Read this story

Settlement Offered in Atrazine Herbicide Case
Read this storySyngenta reaches a deal with several community waters systems, to end a lawsuit against atrazine; product to remain available to the U.S. market.
Read this story

Farm Bill Heads for Senate Floor
Read this storyCleared by the Senate Ag Committee in April, the farm bill is now ready for debate on the floor.
Read this story

 
Farm Bill Heads for Senate Floor
The Buzz: Grain Market Chaos Continues
Settlement Offered in Atrazine Herbicide Case
Afternoon Recap by Arlan Suderman
Meat Exports Holding Steady
Morning Call by Bryce Knorr
MF Global Friday: Exec Pay Surprise
Weak Corn Exports Undermine Farm Futures Prices
Livestock Call By John Otte
Weekly Corn Review
Top 50 Tags
4-H afternoon recap American Farm Bureau Federation American Soybean Association animal health arlan suderman biodiesel biofuels bryce knorr BSE Bushel checkoff cotton Drought Environmental Protection Agency EPA ethanol Extension extension service farm farm bill Farm Bureau farm futures farm futures magazine farm futures market farm progress Farm Service Agency farmfutures farmfutures.com farming farmprogress.com fertilizer FFA free trade agreement Harvest insurance labor legal National Cattlemen's Beef Association National Corn Growers Association NCGA soybean soybean association soybeans SURE usda wheat winter wheat www.farmfutures www.farmfutures.com