Case IH Power Tab

Farm Futures
   Search Site:   Thursday, May 24, 2012 | Bookmark This Site   
Skip Navigation Links
Home
Markets
News
Weather
Farm Futures NOW!
Magazine Online
RSS News
Land For Sale
Mobile
Subscribe
Reprints
Register
Login
About Us
Advertise
 
Share This
 

A Closer Look at the ARRM Farm Bill Proposal

Illinois farm management specialist says proposal would work.
Compiled by staff 
Published: Oct 19, 2011

The Aggregate Risk and Revenue Management program, or ARRM, is a Farm Bill proposal from Senators Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, Dick Durbin, D-Ill., Richard Lugar, R-Ind., John Thune, R-S.D.

ARRM would replace direct payments, the counter-cyclical program, marketing loans, Average Crop Revenue Election and SURE. According to University of Illinois Farm Management Specialist Gary Schnitkey the program is most like ACRE.

"ARRM will make payments based on what happens to five years of revenue at the crop reporting district level," Schnitkey said. "So ACRE was a state level, ARRM is a crop reporting district level. It has a 90% revenue trigger and makes payments on a maximum of 15% of the revenue guarantee; 90% is the same as ACRE, 15% is less than ACRE. The big change is it is based on five years of revenue, Olympic average, whereas ACRE was based on five years of yields and two years of prices."

Schnitkey says the five year Olympic average would provide stable price protection, and using crop reporting districts would help the program better reflect local field conditions and make it useable in fringe areas. ARRM replaces many programs with one and it does so under the constraints of the budget. Schnitkey says it works but perhaps not as lucratively as previous programs.

"In Illinois, and we looked at this from 95 to 2010, ARRM would have made payments in 98, 99, 2000, 2001 and 2005," Schnitkey said. "The 98 through 2001 period was a period of low incomes primarily because of low incomes. Prices fell pretty dramatically from prior to that and ARRM would have made payments during that period."

But Schnitkey says those payments over the four years including 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2001 would have been substantially less than the government programs of the time. Factually, many farmers in central Illinois would have lost money four years in a row if ARRM had been in place. The program, under the current budget constraints, just isn't robust enough to deal with sub $2 corn. That said, Schnitkey believes it's not a bad compromise.

"It would make less payments than the current set of programs," Schnitkey said. "The current set of programs made an average payment of $42 per acre over that time period, ARRM would make $11. So it is significantly less, but given the budgetary environment that's probably what is going to happen and it does target those years when revenues were low."

To learn more about the Aggregate Risk and Revenue Management program from Gary Schnitkey visit www.farmdocdaily.illinois.edu.



Permalink: Click here

Tagged: farm, farm bill, SURE, government programs

Comments
Read comments from others and share your own thoughts.
Please provide the answer to the following question:

 = 
$11 won't even pay 1/2 of my fungicide. Sigh Ah Nara USDA!!! In my next life I will be a First Lady who spends her spare time drawing plates of food for people too dumb to understand the food pyramid. Or maybe a Sec of Ag who spends all of his time taking farming funds and spending them on exotic school lunches, instead. Kiwi anyone?
Posted by Anonymous on October 20 at 8:26 AM
Who sits around and dreams about acronyms for the next bureaucratic nightmare of a farm program foisted on the American farmer? Villified for accepting a few pennies in the name of food policy, farmers are sick and tired of Gov interference in every aspect of their lives. Hopefully the only hook the USDA will still have in American Agriculture is crop in surance subsidies. And, if they stop those, maybe I will stop insuring crops. Ah yes, then only the DNR, NCRS, and EPA meddlintg to worry about...........
Posted by Anonymous on October 20 at 8:19 AM
Who sits around and dreams about acronyms for the next bureaucratic nightmare of a farm program foisted on the American farmer? Villified for accepting a few pennies in the name of food policy, farmers are sick and tired of Gov interference in every aspect of their lives. Hopefully the only hook the USDA will still have in American Agriculture is crop in surance subsidies. And, if they stop those, maybe I will stop insuring crops. Ah yes, then only the DNR, NCRS, and EPA meddlintg to worry about...........
Posted by Anonymous on October 20 at 8:19 AM
Now I understand why I don't don't farm programs. For $11.00 for the new program per acre is not enough to bother with the paperwork and other hoops to jump though. Its really nice not Having everyone knowing your business. At this rate it won't pay for my office time to fill out the paperwork. The wife will not even let it on her desk at that rate. It will hit the round file.
Posted by Anonymous on October 19 at 6:47 PM
It seems alot of time, money and research is going into the new program. I say eliminate all the programs and replace with only fair valued crop revenue insurance that we already use. An expensive program to administrate with an $11 per acre payment in the short times is just plain insane. With recent high and volitile crop input costs $11 is not even a band-aid. Eliminate all programs and put the money towards insurance. At the same time eliminate the USDA involvement in crop reporting and everyone will be better off including producer and consumer.
Posted by Anonymous on October 19 at 12::50 PM
 
Search this site:   

Read More Stories
USDA Expands Credit Available to Farms
Read this storyAgency expands credit available to farmers and ranchers. And a new microloan program targets small farmers to help them avoid high-interest debt.
Read this story

NCGA Wants You to Power Up Top-Yielding Techniques
Read this storyThis week online entry for the 2012 National Corn Yield Contest begins.
Read this story

Brazil, U.S. Cotton Leaders Meet
Read this storyRising concerns over drop in cotton use has leaders from the two nations talking collaboration.
Read this story

 
Morning Call by Bryce Knorr
Grain Market Eyes Europe, Weather
USDA Expands Credit Available to Farms
Weak Corn Exports Undermine Farm Futures Prices
Afternoon Recap by Arlan Suderman
Livestock Call By John Otte
Are Milk and Meat Selection Overemphasized?
Corn Futures Price Rise Speaks Volumes
Weekly Fertilizer Review
Grain Price Declines Have Deeper Roots
Top 50 Tags
4-H afternoon recap American Farm Bureau Federation American Soybean Association animal health arlan suderman biodiesel biofuels bryce knorr BSE Bushel checkoff cotton Drought Environmental Protection Agency EPA ethanol Extension extension service farm farm bill Farm Bureau farm futures farm futures magazine farm futures market farm progress Farm Service Agency farmfutures farmfutures.com farming farmprogress.com fertilizer FFA free trade agreement Harvest insurance labor legal National Cattlemen's Beef Association National Corn Growers Association NCGA soybean soybean association soybeans SURE usda wheat winter wheat www.farmfutures www.farmfutures.com