Farm Futures
   Search Site:  Search Site Saturday, May 18, 2013 | Bookmark This Site   
Skip Navigation Links
Home
Markets
News
Weather
Farm Futures NOW!
Magazine Online
RSS News
Mobile
Subscribe
Reprints
Register
Login
About Us
Advertise
 
  • Post to Your Wall.
 

Restricted Use Pesticides Need Extra Care

Weed Science Society of America points out the importance of training and management of this class of crop protection products.
Compiled by staff 
Published: Jan 2, 2013

Recently a horticultural company was fined for using restricted use pesticides in ways inconsistent with the product label - including workers not adequately protected. In another case, a company was fined because it didn't keep proper records on RUPs.

Going into 2013 it's a good idea for farmers to keep in mind that RUPs are important tools, but they still require special care. "RUPs are pesticides that have been determined by the Environmental Protection Agency to have a greater chance of causing harm to public health, farm workers, domestic animals, wildlife, certain crops, water or other sensitive organisms or sites," says Gina Alessandri, president of the Association of American Pesticide Control Officials and director, Pesticide and Plant Pest Management Division, Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development.

HANDLE CAREFULLY: Restricted use pesticides are potent tools for weed and pest control, keep proper use in mind for 2013.

HANDLE CAREFULLY: Restricted use pesticides are potent tools for weed and pest control, keep proper use in mind for 2013.
She notes that there are more stringent requirements regarding applicator training, oversight and record-keeping, as well as product-specific requirements, such as more extensive personal protective equipment. The idea of RUPs originated in California more than 60 years ago when concerns about protecting some sensitive crops from phenoxy herbicide drift arose. In 1972, amendments to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act established RUPs on a national level.

There are a range of issues that can get a compound classified as an RUP including human health concerns, environmental worries, or complexity of use. Here are some key points to remember about RUPs if you're using them in 2013:

·         The label.  When a pesticide is classified as restricted use, the words "Restricted Use Pesticide" will appear at the top of the front panel.  The reason for the RUP classification will usually be shown as well. 

·         The formulation. The RUP classification is for a specific formulation(s).  For example, a highly concentrated emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulation of an active ingredient may be restricted, while the granular formulation or low concentration EC may not be restricted.  

·         The intended use.  The formulation may be restricted for agricultural, residential or indoor uses, all uses, use on certain crops, etc.  

·         The sale.  Distributors, dealers and retailers must be licensed to sell RUPs.  They must carefully document these sales and must sell only to buyers who are certified (specially trained) to apply RUPs for the intended use.    

·         The application.  The RUP may only be applied by a certified applicator or someone under a certified applicator's direct supervision, and only for those purposes covered by the applicator's certification. 

·         The RUP list.  Some states use the EPA's RUP list as their RUP list, while other states require that certain additional products be restricted, usually due to local conditions that result in environmental concerns.  A product on the EPA's RUP list must also be restricted for use in every state that registers it.  Some restricted use products may be federally registered but not registered at all in certain states. 

"Classification of a pesticide as restricted use to protect human health or the environment is a critical component of the pesticide registration process," says Alessandri.  "It allows certain products to be available by establishing stricter conditions of use."

- Source: Weed Science Society of America



Permalink: Click here

Tagged: EPA, department of agriculture, Environmental Protection Agency, pest management, michigan department of agriculture

Comments
Read comments from others and share your own thoughts.
Please provide the answer to the following question:

 = 
 
Search this site:   

Read More Stories
7 Things You Might Have Missed This Week
Read this storyFarm Bill, organic crop insurance expansion and a recipe for a good 'pie'
Read this story

Argentina, Brazil Join U.S. in International Corn Alliance
Read this storyCorn groups form MAIZALL Alliance to share common interest in corn marketing and production
Read this story

Stabenow Outlines Plan Forward For Senate Farm Bill
Read this storySenate Ag Committee Chairwoman recaps Farm Bill provisions, indicates timeline
Read this story

   
Afternoon Recap by Paul Burgener
Morning Market Review by Bryce Knorr
Weekly Corn Review
Traders Might Find Cattle on Feed Report Bearish
Weekly Wheat Review
Weekly Soybean Review
7 Things You Might Have Missed This Week
Economic Nitrogen Fertilizer for Corn
Weekly Fertilizer Review
Security Issues on Korean Peninsula
Top 50 Tags
2008 farm bill 4-H American Farm Bureau Federation American Soybean Association animal health biofuel biofuels BSE checkoff Corn Belt crop insurance department of agriculture Drought dryland Environmental Protection Agency EPA extension service farm bill Farm Bureau farm programs farm progress farm progress show Farm Service Agency farm show farmprogress farmprogress.com farmprogressshow farmprogressshow.com FDA FFA Food and Drug Administration free trade agreement hay expo House Agriculture Committee husker harvest Husker Harvest Days huskerharvestdays.com livestock livestock producers National Cattlemen's Beef Association National Corn Growers Association NCGA New York Farm Show Progress show Senate Agriculture Committee soybean association the farm bill usda winter wheat www.farmprogress.com