Farm Futures
   Search Site:  Search Site Saturday, May 25, 2013 | Bookmark This Site   
Skip Navigation Links
Home
Markets
News
Weather
Farm Futures NOW!
Magazine Online
RSS News
Mobile
Subscribe
Reprints
Register
Login
About Us
Advertise
 
  • Post to Your Wall.
 

Report Characterizes Farm Bill Differences

MU report explains that the Senate and House versions of the Farm Bill have key differences, yet much in common.
Compiled by staff 
Published: Aug 22, 2012

In a report released Friday, the University of Missouri Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute details possible consequences of key provisions within the Senate-passed and House Agriculture Committee-passed farm bills.

The Senate Farm Bill, titled the "Agriculture Reform, Food and Jobs Act of 2012" was passed in mid-June, whereas the House Farm Bill, titled the "Federal Agriculture Reform and Risk Management Act of 2012" was only passed out of committee before Congress' August recess.

The report compares the largest changes in both bills, including the elimination of direct payments, the addition of the Stacked Income Protection Plan, Agriculture Risk Coverage and Supplemental Coverage Option programs in the Senate version and the establishment of Price Loss Coverage and Revenue Loss Coverage plus STAX and SCO in the House version.

MU report explains that the Senate and House versions of the Farm Bill have key differences, yet much in common.

MU report explains that the Senate and House versions of the Farm Bill have key differences, yet much in common.
Differences and similarities between the two bills were calculated using MU baseline data that assumes continuation of current farm bill policy. The report explained that the two bills are very similar in that they both replace direct payment programs with programs that focus on current production levels, and farm spending would be reduced under both.

According to the report, the Congressional Budget Office has determined savings from the Senate bill to be approximately $18 billion and savings from the House bill to be $18.5 billion. The study also found that impact on commodity markets would be minimal.

A key difference between the two bills is the additional support to peanut, wheat, rice and barley growers offered in the House Committee bill, but not in the Senate's version. However, protections for corn and soybeans would be greater under the Senate bill than under the House Ag Committee bill.

Under both bills, the report found, farm real estate values would decline, as would net farm income.

Possibly one of the most significant differences between the two bills is the level of coverage for different crops.

"In the House Committee bill, the combination of PLC, RLC, SCO and STAX provide similar levels of average support to producers of corn, soybeans and cotton relative to that provided by the Senate bill. In contrast, average producer program benefits are far greater under the House Committee bill for wheat, rice, barley and peanuts. These programs provide an average of about $17 per acre for corn, $9 per acre for soybeans, $14 per acre for wheat, $41 per acre for upland cotton $94 per acre for rice and $86 per acre for peanuts. For most crops, prices are lower under the House Committee bill than under the Senate bill, so the market value of production per acre is also lower," the report says.

The $5 billion spending difference between the two bills is relatively small when compared to outlay changes cause by DCP and ACRE elimination, the report says.

"In the House Committee bill, the new PLC, RLC, STAX and SCO provisions offset some of the savings from eliminating the DCP and ACRE programs. The estimated 10-year budgetary effect of the provisions examined is to reduce net outlays by $12.5 billion relative to the Baseline. Expenditures by the Commodity Credit Corporation for traditional farm programs, PLC and RLC are reduced by a net of $28.1 billion, while crop insurance costs associated with SCO, STAX and changes in producer participation and coverage levels increase net outlays by $15.7 billion," the report notes.

 



Permalink: Click here

Tagged: farm bill, farm programs, crop insurance, House Agriculture Committee, House Ag Committee

Comments
Read comments from others and share your own thoughts.
Please provide the answer to the following question:

 = 
 
Search this site:   

Read More Stories
7 Things You Might Have Missed this Week
Read this storyImpressive planting progress, country of origin labeling and a moveable 'rain' shed
Read this story

CBO Releases Cost Estimate for House Ag Committee-Passed Farm Bill
Read this storyCongressional Budget Office estimates Farm Bill will fall short of projected $40B in deficit reduction
Read this story

Senate Farm Bill Debate Marches On
Read this storySenators tackle four amendments on day four of Farm Bill debate; wrap up discussion until June 3
Read this story

   
Morning Market Review by Bryce Knorr
Afternoon Recap by Paul Burgener
Weekly Corn Review
7 Things You Might Have Missed this Week
Weekly Soybean Review
Weekly Wheat Review
Economic Nitrogen Fertilizer for Corn
Super Farm Planning Tool
Sharing the Farm Equipment Load
CRP Decisions Made Simple
Top 50 Tags
2008 farm bill 4-H American Farm Bureau Federation American Soybean Association animal health biofuel biofuels BSE checkoff Corn Belt crop insurance department of agriculture Drought dryland Environmental Protection Agency EPA extension service farm bill Farm Bureau farm programs farm progress farm progress show Farm Service Agency farm show farmprogress farmprogress.com farmprogressshow farmprogressshow.com FFA Food and Drug Administration free trade agreement hay expo House Agriculture Committee husker harvest Husker Harvest Days huskerharvestdays.com livestock livestock producers National Cattlemen's Beef Association National Corn Growers Association NCBA NCGA New York Farm Show Progress show Senate Agriculture Committee soybean association the farm bill usda winter wheat www.farmprogress.com