Farm Futures
   Search Site:  Search Site Monday, April 21, 2014 | Bookmark This Site   
Skip Navigation Links
Home
Markets
News
Weather
Farm Futures NOW!
Magazine Online
RSS News
Mobile
Subscribe
Reprints
Register
Login
About Us
Advertise

Pile on the Farm Bill Amendments

Senate's first real day of farm debate shows regional, political differences…as predicted.

Published on: Jun 13, 2012

Before the Senate took up official debate of its version of the 2012 Farm Bill this week, the initial list of amendments hit 90. By the time the measure was moving on the floor - or rather not moving - the list of amendments had ballooned to 220, and not all were directed at the farm bill.

However, it's clear that those regional differences over the farm safety net are already bubbling up as amendments get reviewed, and in many cases tabled, by Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. Two amendments have so far cleared the system - one looks at creating food stamps as a block grant, and the other looks at ending the Sugar Program.

RICE VS. BEANS? Southern producers are concerned that the safety net in the Senate version of the 2012 Farm Bill wont cut it for them.
RICE VS. BEANS? Southern producers are concerned that the 'safety net' in the Senate version of the 2012 Farm Bill won't cut it for them.

The discussion was wide-ranging, as the non-farm bill amendments clogged the list of actions that might be taken. The swelling list of amendments does contain measure that would add to the significant changes proposed by this version of the farm bill from packer ownership to means testing or limits on adjusted gross incomes for folks receiving farm bill payments.

The regional differences arise due to the proposed end of direct and countercyclical payments, which farmers in the South - including not only peanut and rice growers, but even corn growers - say would hurt them financially.

Regional amendments

A Politico report on debate details a proposal by Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., to bring back a regionalized from of the direct and countercyclical payment program. The argument is over price targets for peanuts and rice - both crops with a different investment and risk profile that Midwest corn and soybeans. According to the report, the Chambliss move would give farmers the option of using the program with target prices for each crop - $534 per ton for peanuts and $13.98 per ton for rice. Those prices would be enough to cover cost of production but not guarantee a farmer a profit in the event of a disaster.

Nutrition programs remain another challenge for the bill. A proposed cut of $4.5 billion isn't sitting well with some in the Senate - or the Obama Administration either. Nutrition programs make up about 80% of the farm bill. And while some are against the cuts, there are Republicans in the House and Senate that would like to see bigger cuts in the program.

Fox News talked with the chair of USA Rice Producers Group who says direct payments have been the key program for those farmers in the past. The proposed changes to the bill could impact the crop mix in the future.

Even corn growers are concerned about changes to the bill. The Corn Producers Association of Texas issued a statement last week that says the Senate Bill "does not give farmers the freedom to choose the risk management tool that fits their operation. Corn growers in many areas, especially Texas, need options," the statement says.