Farm Futures
   Search Site:  Search Site Friday, April 18, 2014 | Bookmark This Site   
Skip Navigation Links
Farm Futures NOW!
Magazine Online
RSS News
About Us

Farm Bureau Testifies Against Medicare Tax

Group says tax will harm farmer and ranchers due to farming's capital-intensive nature

Published on: Mar 6, 2013

New Medicare taxes, the health insurance tax and penalties for failure to meet coverage requirements will harm the nation's farm and ranch families, the American Farm Bureau Federation told Congress Tuesday.

The new Medicare Contribution Tax, which is a tax on unearned income such as capital gains, will burden farmers and ranchers more than many other taxpayers because farming and ranching is a capital-intensive business, AFBF noted in a statement submitted to the House Subcommittee on Oversight of the Ways and Means Committee. 

Further, AFBF said the imposition of the Medicare Contribution Tax when a farm or ranch is sold amounts to a retirement tax on agricultural producers because it will go into effect when farmers sell their businesses to fund retirement. Beginning farmers could be affected as well, as adding this tax on top of capital gains taxes will make it more difficult for them to acquire land needed to get started in business. 

Group says tax will harm farmer and ranchers due to farmings capital-intensive nature
Group says tax will harm farmer and ranchers due to farming's capital-intensive nature

Farm Bureau supports repeal of the 3.8% Medicare Contribution Tax that will be applied to unearned income of higher-income taxpayers and the 0.9% Medicare tax that will be imposed on wages and self-employment income above established thresholds for high-income individuals.

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the tax comes into play if the individual's wages, compensation, or self-employment income exceed the threshold amount for the individuals filing status: Married filing jointly, $250,000; Married filing separately, $125,000; Single, $200,000; Head of household, $200,000; and widower with dependent child, $200,000.

Farm Bureau also supports legislation to repeal the Health Insurance Tax, claiming it will raise insurance costs, making it harder for farmers and ranchers to purchase coverage.

In addition, AFBF said the health insurance coverage mandate accompanied by the threat of a tax penalty for noncompliance is only making the situation worse for people unable to afford health care coverage.

"Rural American families already pay a greater percentage of their after-tax family income on health insurance than urban American families," noted AFBF. According to the Council of Economic Advisors, nearly one-quarter of families in rural areas spend more than 10% of their income on health insurance coverage, compared with 18% in urban areas.

Add Comment
  1. Tom in the Desert says:

    AFBF is lost again, out looking for their heads. No RepubliCare will not hurt farmers. And the AFBF folks who put this nonsense together need to refill their med prescriptions - and take their meds this time!

  2. Anonymous says:

    witch is more 10% or 18% ??????????????

  3. Anonymous says:

    $10,000 to 15,000 per acre cropland thanks to corn ethanol which has been heavily subsidized by taxpayers. Massive USDA Farm subsidies all paid by taxpayes. Nobody feels sorry for the "poor" famers......all of whom are multi millionairers thanks to the corn ethanol scam.

    • mrjim says:

      I'm a multi millionaire with 37 acres in 4 plots divided by a railroad and a flowing stream? Its the subdivision developers and the large corporate farms that have been running up land prices. The small farmer doesn't stand a chance in this economy. CRP USDA payments, I could make more with a cash grain crop but am locked in for a 10 year unbreakable contract. You city people need to farm for a couple of years to understand.

      • Willie says:

        No more subsidies for ethanol. The city folks would whine even louder if the price of gas went up without the addition of ethanol. Corn ethanol is cheaper to produce than gasoline from oil even without subsidies.