Farm Futures
   Search Site:  Search Site Friday, May 24, 2013 | Bookmark This Site   
Skip Navigation Links
Home
Markets
News
Weather
Farm Futures NOW!
Magazine Online
RSS News
Mobile
Subscribe
Reprints
Register
Login
About Us
Advertise
 
  • Post to Your Wall.
 

Email Flap Raises Stir in USDA

Media outlet says politically tinged internal email raises questions.
Compiled by staff 
Published: Apr 10, 2012

With all the budget-cutting talk running around Washington, including the Republican-driven House budget plan that would cut at least $33 billion from USDA (though the bill will not pass the Democrat-controlled Senate), and other moves to trim agency spending, talking about future issues could cause a stir. And it has.

According to a story filed in the e-paper The Daily Caller, questions are being asked about an internal memo from Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack that is being called political by some observers. The Daily Caller quotes the email noting that Vilsack says that the House budget resolution hits USDA spending "in a very hard way."

INFERNAL COMMUNICATION? An internal memo from Ag Secretary Tom Vilsack is raising claims of "politicking" in USDA by some.

INFERNAL COMMUNICATION? An internal memo from Ag Secretary Tom Vilsack is raising claims of "politicking" in USDA by some.
The concerned raised is whether Vilsack is actually "campaigning" to employees and if so, would he be against the Republicans. If so, that could be violation of the Hatch Act, which bans campaign activity by federal employees. In the internal memo, Vilsack reportedly compared the House plan to Obama's suggested budget, noting the latter is more supportive.

Responding to the Caller, a USDA staffer says the Vilsack has made it "a priority to communicate regularly with employees" about the federal budget, and other actions that could impact employees' day-to-day lives.

Check out the memo link, which the Caller published. whether readers can see any political slant to the content may be in the eye of the beholder. In the memo, Vilsack notes that the Obama budget includes "a slight increase" for the agency's discretionary budget and while more than the previous year is still $3 billion below 2010 fiscal year. He also points out several points, including the implied cuts of the House budget and what they might mean for USDA.



Permalink: Click here

Tagged: usda

Comments
Read comments from others and share your own thoughts.
Please provide the answer to the following question:

 = 
Hey, Anonymous, are you a government employee? If we don't starting worrying about politics very soon, there will be no future need to worry about "the farmer in the field". A few things to ponder include: EPA dust regulations, Labor Dept bans working teenagers, Transportation wants you to get a CDL to drive a tractor, USDA advertises for food stamp recipients (45 million people currently). And, Vilsack is "politicking" when he mentioned the Defense Dept (or maybe just whining). R Lonsinger, Osborne, KS
Anonymous on 4/10/2012 9:06:00 AM
I just read the memo link you provided and think this guy is just laying out to the department's employees the cold hard truth of the future budgets in Washington. I think this memo link should be required reading for all on-the-tractor farmers as we are all facing a time of cuts from Washington. The next farm program budget could be decimated. It is time to get over the Rep/Dem talk and to start to look at how all this is going to effect our bottom lines. Imagine no ARS doing the basic research to keep us all ahead of problems in ag in the future. Imagine trying to get ahold of an Extension Office person to help with identifying a field problem only to find out your local office is three counties away and this guy is only in on alternate Wednesdays, oops that already is happening. Quit worrying about the politics and start worrying about the farmer in the field.
Anonymous on 4/10/2012 7:41:00 AM
 
Search this site:   

Read More Stories
7 Things You Might Have Missed this Week
Read this storyImpressive planting progress, country of origin labeling and a moveable 'rain' shed
Read this story

CBO Releases Cost Estimate for House Ag Committee-Passed Farm Bill
Read this storyCongressional Budget Office estimates Farm Bill will fall short of projected $40B in deficit reduction
Read this story

Senate Farm Bill Debate Marches On
Read this storySenators tackle four amendments on day four of Farm Bill debate; wrap up discussion until June 3
Read this story

   
Morning Market Review by Bryce Knorr
Afternoon Recap by Paul Burgener
Senate Farm Bill Debate Marches On
Grain Futures Pull Back After Rally
USDA Retains Country of Origin Labeling Requirement
Livestock Call by John Otte
Weekly Corn Review
Weekly Fertilizer Review
NASS Preps to Take Stock of Crops, Livestock
Sugar Policy Dominates Farm Bill Discussion
Top 50 Tags
2008 farm bill 4-H American Farm Bureau Federation American Soybean Association animal health biofuel biofuels BSE checkoff Corn Belt crop insurance department of agriculture Drought dryland Environmental Protection Agency EPA extension service farm bill Farm Bureau farm programs farm progress farm progress show Farm Service Agency farm show farmprogress farmprogress.com farmprogressshow farmprogressshow.com FFA Food and Drug Administration free trade agreement hay expo House Agriculture Committee husker harvest Husker Harvest Days huskerharvestdays.com livestock livestock producers National Cattlemen's Beef Association National Corn Growers Association NCBA NCGA New York Farm Show Progress show Senate Agriculture Committee soybean association the farm bill usda winter wheat www.farmprogress.com