Farm Futures
   Search Site:  Search Site Thursday, May 23, 2013 | Bookmark This Site   
Skip Navigation Links
Home
Markets
News
Weather
Farm Futures NOW!
Magazine Online
RSS News
Mobile
Subscribe
Reprints
Register
Login
About Us
Advertise
 
  • Post to Your Wall.
 

E15 Release Not Welcomed by Petroleum Institute

The American Petroleum Institute tells drivers to "beware" of E15; RFA maintains its safety
Compiled by staff 
Published: Jul 16, 2012

In light of the recent EPA approval of E15 for the commercial marketplace and first availability of E15 at a Kansas gas station, the American Petroleum Institute issued a warning to drivers, urging them to avoid using E15.

"We need to press the pause button on EPA's rush to allow higher amounts of ethanol in our gasoline," said Bob Greco, API downstream group director. "The new fuel could lead to engine damage in more than 5 million vehicles on the road today and could void the manufacturer's warranty."

The American Petroleum Institute tells drivers to "beware" of E15; RFA maintains its safety

The American Petroleum Institute tells drivers to "beware" of E15; RFA maintains its safety
But, despite API claims, the Renewable Fuels Association maintains E15 safety.

"If you take the argument of API and other biofuel critics to its logical conclusion, based on the study they cite, they should be warning Americans against using so-'called 'clear gasoline' as well given that vehicles failed in their limited testing on that fuel also," said Renewable Fuels Association President and CEO Bob Dinneen.

The study cited by the API is the same Coordinating Research Council study that was questioned for its accuracy in June by four Iowa Congressmen, who asserted that the vehicles used in the study had pre-existing flaws, and that a proper control group was not established.

The congressmembers issued a letter following release of the study, including commentary from the Department of Energy which highlighted its flaws: "We believe the choice of test engines, test cycle, limited fuel selection, and failure criteria of the CRC program resulted in unreliable and incomplete data, which severely limits the utility of the study."

RFA called the study "highly questionable," and Dinneen remained firm about the safety of E15 for 2001 and newer vehicles. He said E15 has been the most thoroughly tested fuel in American history.

"Ethanol has been a safe and effective fuel component in wide use for more than three decades. It's time to move past the nonsense and constructively work to bring Americans the choice at the pump they want and deserve," Dinneen said.



Permalink: Click here

Tagged: EPA, biofuel

Comments
Read comments from others and share your own thoughts.
Please provide the answer to the following question:

 = 
A "study" as this one is very similar to the rhetoric used by some OEM's and their intial responses to the use of Biodiesel. What was throughly concluded was if the engines components were affected, the reason is that they were the most inferior and hapened to be the cheapest product on the market, such as for example butyl. I hate to say this, but Stihl is a favorite of mine but the most lazy and lack of forsight in planning when sourcing "quality parts in reference to the fuel tank.
Anonymous on 7/24/2012 12:48:00 PM
Car dealers that won't warrant E15 use in the new lineup of vehicles should not be allowed to sell them at all in the US. If the new cars "don't work on E-15 then they should not be sold. Keep gasoline profits in America not the Middle East! Stop fracking and start fermenting!!!
Anonymous on 7/16/2012 9:04:00 PM
In reading the studlly, I find the most telling information is that except for the engines under manufactuer's recall, all 28 engines continued to meet the manufactuer's specifiations. B_Brandon
Anonymous on 7/16/2012 11:32:00 AM
Why doesn't the RFA accept responsibility for any and all ethanol related engine damage! Their members are the one's benefiting from E15 so why doesn't the RFA create a fund that all ethanol producers have to pay into. The fund would be used to pay for engine damage. I believe in personal responsibility. (A unique concept these days.) The ethanol producers want the benefit but not the responsibility. Typical.
Anonymous on 7/16/2012 11:18:00 AM
The EPA and DOE both knew two years ago this study by CRC was flawed. Unfortunately the DOE didn’t speak up till after CRC and API made the big announcement on the results. This is strictly about market share and the oil industry lead by API doesn’t want to see anymore ethanol in the market place. Due to weather issues, I am sure they are going to reignite the food verses fuel debate but like last time, avoid the protein value discussion. They would rather see tar sand operation expand but does anyone realize how much steam has to be pumped in the ground to get that oil. One growing concern I see comes down to what is in the 90 percent gasoline that is in the market today. If people only knew.
Anonymous on 7/16/2012 11:10:00 AM
I keep wondering how long until people will simply take matters into their own hands. If engine damage due to higher temperature ethanol burn is an issue, people might simply start looking for higher performance parts to try an enable their cars to handle the additional stress.
John Irelan on 7/16/2012 8:36:00 AM
When? When will someone discuss or do a story about an engine already designed around the characteristics of ethanol which should be available? The engine is the EBDI produced by Ricardo Engineering. A V-6, with more horsepower and torque almost better than a traditional diesel. In addition, GM already has this engine and has been testing for at least 2 years. The public should know about this. I want this engine.
Anonymous on 7/16/2012 5:33:00 AM
 
Search this site:   

Read More Stories
Storms, Rains Lend A Little Drought Relief
Read this storyRains across the Plains provide a bit of drought relief while stalling planting progress in the Midwest moving eastward.
Read this story

Sugar Policy Dominates Farm Bill Discussion
Read this storySenators entertain amendments to eliminate sugar program, establish SNAP block grants
Read this story

EPA Proposes Wide Range of Changes to RFS
Read this storyEnvironmental Protection Agency proposes modification to RFS to include new pathway for isobutanol, clarify eligibility for ethanol from crop residues
Read this story

   
Morning Market Review by Bryce Knorr
Afternoon Recap by Paul Burgener
USDA Retains Country of Origin Labeling Requirement
Sugar Policy Dominates Farm Bill Discussion
EPA Proposes Wide Range of Changes to RFS
Storms, Rains Lend A Little Drought Relief
Weekly Fertilizer Review
Livestock Call by John Otte
Economic Nitrogen Fertilizer for Corn
Senate Judiciary Committee Passes Immigration Reform Bill
Top 50 Tags
2008 farm bill 4-H American Farm Bureau Federation American Soybean Association animal health biofuel biofuels BSE checkoff Corn Belt crop insurance department of agriculture Drought dryland Environmental Protection Agency EPA extension service farm bill Farm Bureau farm programs farm progress farm progress show Farm Service Agency farm show farmprogress farmprogress.com farmprogressshow farmprogressshow.com FFA Food and Drug Administration free trade agreement hay expo House Agriculture Committee husker harvest Husker Harvest Days huskerharvestdays.com livestock livestock producers National Cattlemen's Beef Association National Corn Growers Association NCBA NCGA New York Farm Show Progress show Senate Agriculture Committee soybean association the farm bill usda winter wheat www.farmprogress.com