Farm Futures
   Search Site:  Search Site Thursday, April 17, 2014 | Bookmark This Site   
Skip Navigation Links
Home
Markets
News
Weather
Farm Futures NOW!
Magazine Online
RSS News
Mobile
Subscribe
Reprints
Register
Login
About Us
Advertise

Bill Introduced to Approve Portion of XL Pipeline

Legislation will allow Congress to vote on permits for TransCanada pipeline construction.

Published on: Jan 31, 2012

Senator Mike Johanns, R-Neb., wants to see a major portion of the Keystone XL pipeline under construction.  To do so, the Johanns is co-sponsoring legislation that would allow Congress to vote on granting TransCanada the required permits to begin construction of the Keystone XL pipeline.  But that does not include the pipeline going through Nebraska.  That route is still being negotiated.

The legislation builds off the completed Environmental Impact Statement finished by the U.S. State Department on August 26, 2011.

Among the cosponsors of the legislation are Senators Richard Lugar, R-Ind., Roy Blunt, R-Mo., David Vitter, R-La., and John Hoeven, R-N.D. The bill is cosponsored by a bipartisan group of 44 Senators. Despite President Barack Obama's recent decision to block the project, the Keystone XL Pipeline continues to garner broad bipartisan and public support due to its ability to help create thousands of American jobs and reduce America's dependence on foreign oil.

"The President gives speeches about energy security and creating jobs, but this legislation would actually do it," Johanns said. "The President rejected this project because of politics. Congress now has the responsibility to approve it because it's clearly in the best interest of our country."

The legislation was introduced Monday by Hoeven.

This project would create 20,000 American jobs, generate $20.9 billion in new private sector spending, reinforce America's energy security, and benefit 1,400 American job creators all without costing taxpayers a dime.

"This project is good for America's job creation and energy independence, and that's why I'm proud to join my colleagues to co-sponsor this bill," Blunt said. "More American energy means more American jobs, and this is the largest shovel-ready project in our country today. Yet despite his rhetoric in support of an 'all-of-the-above' energy strategy, President Obama has opted to put politics before good policy."

Comments:
Add Comment
  1. Anonymous says:

    It most certainly doen not have my support. It will create jobs, however, it will also impact the enviroment.Please help stop this pipeline. No more oil leaks and enviromental disasters.

  2. Anonymous says:

    I worked on the Alaskan pipeline, if the XL is going to create 20,000 jobs they'll have to dig the ditch with a shovel. The pipeline will eventually be built under Obama but in the meantime it sets a very bad precedent for the clowns in Congress to be giving out building permits. Leave that to people who are experts in something other than raising campaign dollars.

  3. Anonymous says:

    prairie rose, Feb 1, 2012 Of course it is political. Instead of moving oil by pipeline, it will have to be moved by rail car - and one of the big railroads moving oil will be BNSF, a part of the Berkshire-Hathaway group (Warren Buffet, Obama' ally)

  4. Anonymous says:

    There will be incidences of sabotage that will need to be planned for. This project was opposed by radicals that have no morals or limits. And yes, our President eventually caved to them.