Farm Futures
   Search Site:  Search Site Tuesday, June 18, 2013 | Bookmark This Site   
Skip Navigation Links
Home
Markets
News
Weather
Farm Futures NOW!
Magazine Online
RSS News
Mobile
Subscribe
Reprints
Register
Login
About Us
Advertise
 
  • Post to Your Wall.
 

Audit Shows FSA Overpaid $28 Million in SURE Claims

USDA Office of the Inspector General recommends further oversight to prevent future miscalculations. 2011 audit shows improvement over 2010 payments.
Compiled by staff 
Published: Jun 4, 2012

The Office of the Inspector General released a May audit of USDA Farm Service Agency assistance programs, estimating that $28 million in FSA payments were improperly distributed during fiscal year 2011.

For the audit, the office sampled 122 payments totaling $5.2 million. Out of the samples, 14 errors were identified, 10 of which were SURE payments.

Many of the errors were caused by data entry mistakes at county offices, including omitting appropriate crop indemnity information, entering incorrect production to count, and entering incorrect county office committee adjusted production, among others.

While the OIG reports that second-party reviewing measures were in place, the reviewers did not detect the errors.

Calculation mistakes down from 2010, but OIG recommends additional reviews.

Calculation mistakes down from 2010, but OIG recommends additional reviews.
Though mistakes were made in the 2011 fiscal year, the report indicates that improvements were made from 2010 in the number and dollar amounts of improper payments. For fiscal year 2010, the OIG estimated $49 million in improper FSA payments.

In response to the audit, FSA issued a notice to state and county offices that stressed the importance of second party reviews, and identified tools to assist with the calculation process. The report indicates that FSA has initiated or completed appropriate corrective actions for all errors.



Permalink: Click here

Tagged: FSA, usda, Farm Service Agency

Comments
Read comments from others and share your own thoughts.
Please provide the answer to the following question:

 = 
The costs of the reviews would be greater than the moneys possibly "overpaid". "second party" means CPA firms which charge more per day than most farmers make per year.
Anonymous on 6/4/2012 8:19:00 PM
 
Search this site:   

Read More Stories
White House Warns of Veto On House Farm Bill
Read this storyObama Administration calls SNAP cuts in Farm Bill 'unacceptable'; House ready to begin floor debate
Read this story

USDA Announces Grants for Rural Small Businesses
Read this storyVilsack announces $4.7 million in additional investment in rural businesses
Read this story

Pollinator Week Focused On Bee Health
Read this storyWeek keeps importance of bees, butterflies, bats and other pollinators top-of-mind
Read this story

   
Morning Market Review by Bryce Knorr
Afternoon Recap by Paul Burgener
Pollinator Week Focused On Bee Health
More Rain Could Slow Crops
Weekly Fertilizer Review
White House Warns of Veto On House Farm Bill
Renewable Fuels Group Says 'Don't Mess with the RFS'
Livestock Call by John Otte
USDA Announces Grants for Rural Small Businesses
House Rules Committee Preps Farm Bill
Top 50 Tags
2008 farm bill 4-H American Farm Bureau Federation American Soybean Association animal health biofuel biofuels BSE checkoff Corn Belt crop insurance department of agriculture Drought dryland Environmental Protection Agency EPA extension service farm bill Farm Bureau farm programs farm progress farm progress show Farm Service Agency farm show farmprogress farmprogress.com farmprogressshow farmprogressshow.com FFA Food and Drug Administration free trade agreement hay expo House Agriculture Committee husker harvest Husker Harvest Days huskerharvestdays.com livestock livestock producers National Cattlemen's Beef Association National Corn Growers Association NCBA NCGA New York Farm Show Progress show Senate Agriculture Committee soybean association the farm bill usda winter wheat www.farmprogress.com