Farm Futures
   Search Site:  Search Site Wednesday, June 19, 2013 | Bookmark This Site   
Skip Navigation Links
Home
Markets
News
Weather
Farm Futures NOW!
Magazine Online
RSS News
Mobile
Subscribe
Reprints
Register
Login
About Us
Advertise
Untitled Document
Case IH - Farm Progress Sweeps
Terms & Conditions
This Business of FarmingThis Business of Farming   
A critical, oft-times irreverent look at cutting edge issues that impact U.S. farmers.
 
  • Post to Your Wall.
 
 

Can the Farmer Capitalize on Preferred Value Chains?

Posted on June 12, 2013

A few weeks ago McDonald’s restaurants in the United Kingdom announced they would begin sourcing all pork from livestock suppliers who met animal-welfare standards established by the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. It was a move designed to appease customers who want two things: local food that is produced in an ethical, responsible way. Now all pork at UK's McDonald's restaurants will come from the farmer who agrees to grow livestock based on "Freedom Food" policies. You can take a look at the 80-page handbook hereWal-Mart, the world's largest food store, is moving in much the same direction.

A happy pig - one grown under strict welfare policies approved to sell to UKs McDonalds restaurants - is a more valuable pig to farmers.

A happy pig - one grown under strict welfare policies approved to sell to UK's McDonald's restaurants - is a more valuable pig to farmers.
It's the latest example of how the supply chain from field to fork is shifting to accommodate consumers’ changing preferences and expectations. Simply put, retailers are trying to satisfy consumer desires and calm their fears. And for the most part, it presents opportunity for the farmer.

History lesson

Those of you who study history know that supply chins of the past were more adversarial than opportunistic. In this country from the late 1800s to the 1940s, the federal government often stepped in to help farmers with antitrust action against railroads and banks that were using monopoly behavior.

The Ag cooperative movement in the teens, 20s and 30’s helped farmers level the playing field vs. big corporations. The union labor movement also helped level the power base during that period, but did not involve farmers to a large extent. It was also a period when the socialist movement in the U.S. was at its height, notes Purdue economist Chris Hurt.

"This was a time when the battle was between the farmer, their input supplier and the buyer of their products," he says. "It was viewed as a zero sum game. If the farmer got another penny for the grain, then the grain buyer lost that penny. This established an adversarial view between farmers and their input suppliers and the buyers of their farm products."

Now, says Hurt, agriculture is moving away from the adversarial view of the farmer battling participants above and below them.

"Today there is growing emphasis on supply chain cooperation and coordination," he says. "The emerging concept is that the entire chain can add value by improved technology, innovation, production, efficiency and coordination. Thus, everyone in the supply chain can be better off."

For farmers, the trick is to find ways to be involved as preferred suppliers in one or more of these value chains. That will often come at high cost if you need to put up new buildings, as many livestock farmers do when faced with changing housing requirements.

California's chicken producers had to make the choice to invest in new housing to accommodate that state's cage-free laws going into effect over the next few years. In England, the farmer will decide if the premium for growing McDonald's pork is worth the trouble to revamp buildings and management. A third of Britain's pig farmers already meet the standards.

More participants in the supply chain are seeking ways producers can add value to finished products through a host of specific attributes, management practices, or ways they produce --such as what drugs or feed ingredients go into crops or animals.

"This is a win-win philosophy, not win-or-lose," says Hurt.

Special attributes

The more commodity-driven the product, the more we tend to see the adversarial approach, like corn to export to Japan. Ten years ago when the world was awash in grain, Japanese buyers would use all kinds of excuses - usually the amount of damaged grain in a shipment - to buy corn on the cheap. But with genetic modification there may be more specific attribute commodity products, such as chicken corn, hog corn, or ethanol corn in the future. Hogs are now primarily produced in tight arrangements with packers. Milk production and marketing is now much more closely coordinated (often between multi thousand cow dairies and milk processors.

McDonald’s potatoes for French fries are not purchased on the commodity market; they are grown by preferred suppliers under some guidelines established between the growers and McDonalds.

Moving away from simple, lowest-cost commodity production is a decision only you can make. Many farmers have already touched these waters through contract production for livestock, as well as grain such as edible beans or non-GMO corn.

The more nimble your business, the better your chances of success.

Add a Comment

Recent Posts
Back to Top
Is Farmland in a Bubble – and Does it Matter?
Posted on January 08, 2013
With expectations high, potential buyers say they will look to buy anyway
Category: Natural resources
Mississippi's Battle to Keep Nutrients in Place
Posted on May 31, 2012
Recycling irrigation water is one of many strategies in Delta Farming conservation strategies
Category: Natural resources
South America’s No-till Pioneer
Posted on April 18, 2012
Brazil’s no-till revolution started with one man who dared to think in unconventional ways
Category: Natural resources
No-till: An Answer for Climate Change?
Posted on April 16, 2012
No-till can mitigate extreme weather and keep soil in place
Category: Natural resources
Tour Proves Why Conservation is Still Cool
Posted on August 09, 2011
No-tillers, innovators gather to learn latest precision, soil-saving techniques
Category: Natural resources
Illinois Farmland Tops $11,000 Per Acre
Posted on June 27, 2011
Red hot land market shows no signs of letting up
Category: Natural resources
Is This the Moon? No, it’s Missouri Farmland
Posted on June 15, 2011
Waters recede near breached levee, revealing crop fields that look more like the Badlands of South Dakota than productive acreage
Category: Natural resources
The Trouble with CSP
Posted on April 18, 2011
Why conservation programs aren't set up to do what farmers – and consumers - want
Category: Natural resources
Farmland: Still Red Hot
Posted on February 25, 2011
Recent Central Illinois sales average around $8,000 per acre
Category: Natural resources
Are We Running Out of Phosphorus?
Posted on February 15, 2011
Maybe not, but the countries that own reserves may scare you
Category: Natural resources
Are We Running Out of Phosphorus?
Posted on November 23, 2010
Fertilizer reserves may be okay, but the countries that own them may scare you
Category: Natural resources
Controlled Drainage: Next Big Thing for Ag?
Posted on October 29, 2010
Subsurface systems provide better water table management and less nitrate runoff
Category: Natural resources
Fifty Years of Service to Agriculture
Posted on September 21, 2010
Agronomist devotes life to improving water efficiency in Nebraska crop production
Category: Natural resources
Why Conservation is Cool (Again)
Posted on August 09, 2010
New generation of 'never-till' farmers are building organic matter – and profits
Category: Natural resources
Dialogue with a Farmer, Part One
Posted on May 27, 2010
Nebraska grower makes a case for more sustainable agriculture
Category: Natural resources
Global Ag Leaders Talk Climate Change
Posted on January 22, 2010
They're looking at ways to make ag more climate friendly, yet feed more people
Category: Natural resources
Blog

Category

Archives

About The Writer
This Business of Farming

Mike Wilson has spent the last 25 years as a writer, photographer and editor for various U.S. agricultural magazines. He grew up on a grain and livestock farm in Ogle County, Ill., and earned a bachelor's degree in agricultural journalism from the University of Illinois in 1981.

He served as editor of Prairie Farmer magazine from 1990 to 2001. He has been executive editor of Farm Futures since 2004.