Farm Futures
   Search Site:  Search Site Wednesday, June 19, 2013 | Bookmark This Site   
Skip Navigation Links
Home
Markets
News
Weather
Farm Futures NOW!
Magazine Online
RSS News
Mobile
Subscribe
Reprints
Register
Login
About Us
Advertise
This Business of FarmingThis Business of Farming   
A critical, oft-times irreverent look at cutting edge issues that impact U.S. farmers.
 
  • Post to Your Wall.
 
 

Can the Farmer Capitalize on Preferred Value Chains?

Posted on June 12, 2013

A few weeks ago McDonald’s restaurants in the United Kingdom announced they would begin sourcing all pork from livestock suppliers who met animal-welfare standards established by the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. It was a move designed to appease customers who want two things: local food that is produced in an ethical, responsible way. Now all pork at UK's McDonald's restaurants will come from the farmer who agrees to grow livestock based on "Freedom Food" policies. You can take a look at the 80-page handbook hereWal-Mart, the world's largest food store, is moving in much the same direction.

A happy pig - one grown under strict welfare policies approved to sell to UKs McDonalds restaurants - is a more valuable pig to farmers.

A happy pig - one grown under strict welfare policies approved to sell to UK's McDonald's restaurants - is a more valuable pig to farmers.
It's the latest example of how the supply chain from field to fork is shifting to accommodate consumers’ changing preferences and expectations. Simply put, retailers are trying to satisfy consumer desires and calm their fears. And for the most part, it presents opportunity for the farmer.

History lesson

Those of you who study history know that supply chins of the past were more adversarial than opportunistic. In this country from the late 1800s to the 1940s, the federal government often stepped in to help farmers with antitrust action against railroads and banks that were using monopoly behavior.

The Ag cooperative movement in the teens, 20s and 30’s helped farmers level the playing field vs. big corporations. The union labor movement also helped level the power base during that period, but did not involve farmers to a large extent. It was also a period when the socialist movement in the U.S. was at its height, notes Purdue economist Chris Hurt.

"This was a time when the battle was between the farmer, their input supplier and the buyer of their products," he says. "It was viewed as a zero sum game. If the farmer got another penny for the grain, then the grain buyer lost that penny. This established an adversarial view between farmers and their input suppliers and the buyers of their farm products."

Now, says Hurt, agriculture is moving away from the adversarial view of the farmer battling participants above and below them.

"Today there is growing emphasis on supply chain cooperation and coordination," he says. "The emerging concept is that the entire chain can add value by improved technology, innovation, production, efficiency and coordination. Thus, everyone in the supply chain can be better off."

For farmers, the trick is to find ways to be involved as preferred suppliers in one or more of these value chains. That will often come at high cost if you need to put up new buildings, as many livestock farmers do when faced with changing housing requirements.

California's chicken producers had to make the choice to invest in new housing to accommodate that state's cage-free laws going into effect over the next few years. In England, the farmer will decide if the premium for growing McDonald's pork is worth the trouble to revamp buildings and management. A third of Britain's pig farmers already meet the standards.

More participants in the supply chain are seeking ways producers can add value to finished products through a host of specific attributes, management practices, or ways they produce --such as what drugs or feed ingredients go into crops or animals.

"This is a win-win philosophy, not win-or-lose," says Hurt.

Special attributes

The more commodity-driven the product, the more we tend to see the adversarial approach, like corn to export to Japan. Ten years ago when the world was awash in grain, Japanese buyers would use all kinds of excuses - usually the amount of damaged grain in a shipment - to buy corn on the cheap. But with genetic modification there may be more specific attribute commodity products, such as chicken corn, hog corn, or ethanol corn in the future. Hogs are now primarily produced in tight arrangements with packers. Milk production and marketing is now much more closely coordinated (often between multi thousand cow dairies and milk processors.

McDonald’s potatoes for French fries are not purchased on the commodity market; they are grown by preferred suppliers under some guidelines established between the growers and McDonalds.

Moving away from simple, lowest-cost commodity production is a decision only you can make. Many farmers have already touched these waters through contract production for livestock, as well as grain such as edible beans or non-GMO corn.

The more nimble your business, the better your chances of success.

Add a Comment

Recent Posts
Back to Top
Ag's Rising Star
Posted on April 16, 2013
South Dakota's Kristi Noem brings a rancher's common sense to a place that sorely needs it: Capitol Hill
Category: At the Statehouse/Capital
A Stop to Nonsensical Ag Regulations?
Posted on March 18, 2013
House bill would put congress back in charge of high impact regulations
Category: At the Statehouse/Capital
Playing Politics with the Sequester
Posted on March 08, 2013
Is the Obama administration trying to make federal cuts as painful as possible?
Category: At the Statehouse/Capital
State of the Union: Not Good
Posted on February 13, 2013
Despite the President's hopeful words, polarization still real and growing
Category: At the Statehouse/Capital
Our Uncivil War
Posted on October 11, 2012
What would Ronald Reagan and Tip O'Neill think about today's election cycle?
Category: At the Statehouse/Capital
Ag Labor Crisis Part Two: Let's Reframe the Debate
Posted on June 13, 2012
Without skilled migrant labor the U.S. risks seeing food production move overseas
Category: At the Statehouse/Capital
Labor Crisis Should Galvanize Agriculture
Posted on June 12, 2012
Farmers need visa reform and guest worker program now
Category: At the Statehouse/Capital
European Farm Policy: A Double-edged Sword
Posted on February 03, 2012
European farmers get more government cash but must also jump through more hoops
Category: At the Statehouse/Capital
Why Europe Still Loves Farm Subsidies
Posted on January 22, 2012
European farmers have closer ties to consumers, who are willing to keep spending government money on agriculture
Category: At the Statehouse/Capital
The President As Grand Moderator
Posted on August 19, 2011
Talking more like a referee than a player, Obama positions himself above the political disconnect in Washington– but will people believe him?
Category: At the Statehouse/Capital
Meet the New Chairman
Posted on March 09, 2011
House Ag Committee Chair Frank Lucas spends equal time digging EPA, championing agriculture
Category: At the Statehouse/Capital
Antitrust Enforcement: Too Little Too Late?
Posted on December 09, 2010
Competition workshops were political victories for Obama
Category: At the Statehouse/Capital
Farm Policy: What's Next?
Posted on November 16, 2010
Washington to focus on farm revenue insurance, EPA overreach
Category: At the Statehouse/Capital
Tables Turned on Animal Activists
Posted on April 01, 2010
Full page USA TODAY ad debunks myth that HSUS helps pet shelters
Category: At the Statehouse/Capital
Michigan Governor Shows Vegetarian Slant
Posted on March 19, 2010
Granholm trashes Michigan's $71 billion ag industry, proclaiming Ag Day is "Meatout Day"
Category: At the Statehouse/Capital
Will Congress Rein in EPA?
Posted on March 03, 2010
'Power grab' won't stand, says Congressman
Category: At the Statehouse/Capital
Justice Department: Getting Serious with Ag?
Posted on January 29, 2010
Antitrust suit against nation's largest dairy company may be shot across the bow for Big Ag
Category: At the Statehouse/Capital
A checklist: Ways to Reconnect with Consumers
Posted on September 09, 2009
Four ways to engage customers and keep regulators at bay
Category: At the Statehouse/Capital
Is ag facing a culture war?
Posted on August 14, 2009
Rising debate about food production methods is concern for policy experts.
Category: At the Statehouse/Capital
Blog

Category

Archives

About The Writer
This Business of Farming

Mike Wilson has spent the last 25 years as a writer, photographer and editor for various U.S. agricultural magazines. He grew up on a grain and livestock farm in Ogle County, Ill., and earned a bachelor's degree in agricultural journalism from the University of Illinois in 1981.

He served as editor of Prairie Farmer magazine from 1990 to 2001. He has been executive editor of Farm Futures since 2004.