For the full article, click on the headline above.
The White House made no secret of its opposition to the farm bill compromise reached between the House and Senate. Wednesday House members on both sides of the aisle sent a strong signal to President Bush in support of the farm bill, passing the Food, Conservation and Energy Act of 2008 by a final vote of 318-106. The House needed 290 votes (two-thirds majority) to override a presidential veto. The Senate began debate Wednesday evening and a vote is scheduled for later today.
The five-year farm bill funding totals $307 billion. Nearly 70% of the bill's spending goes towards domestic nutritional needs, while only 17% of the total budget funds farm programs. And as a part of the total federal budget, farm programs account for only one-quarter of one percent--a two-fold decrease from the 2002 Farm Bill.
Agriculture Secretary Ed Schafer said in a statement the bill was "a bloated, earmark laden bill that spends nearly $20 billion over its original cost and continues to balance subsidy payments to the wealthy on the backs of the middle class taxpayer.
"It does not target help for the farmers who really need it, and it increases the size and cost of government while jeopardizing the future of legitimate farm programs by damaging the credibility of farm bills in general. At a time of record setting income for farmers, it sends the wrong message to the rest of the country who are not experiencing the boom of the agriculture sector. This bill is loaded with taxpayer funded pet projects at a time when Americans are struggling to buy groceries and afford gas to get to work," Schafer said.
In a statement from House Agriculture committee ranking member Bob Goodlatte, Virginia, he said the farm bill is the "most reform-minded farm bill that the House has considered."
In regard to payment issues, Goodlatte said the bill eliminates the three-entity rule that allowed producers, as multiple "entitiesbCrLf, to collect more than one payment. Now, all program payments will be directly attributed to the individual receiving the benefit.
The bill also reduces the current adjusted gross income (AGI) soft-cap of $2.5 million down to a hard-cap of $500,000 for off-farm income which represents an 80% reduction. Additionally, the bill imposes an AGI hard-cap of $750,000 for on-farm income which has been unlimited since the program was created.
"These reforms, along with numerous others, are part of the historic shift in the evolution of our farm policy," Goodlatte said.
Other highlights of the bill include:
The conference report and related materials are available on the Committee's website at http://agriculture.house.gov/inside/FarmBill.html.
A one-page summary is available at agriculture.house.gov/inside/Legislation/110/FB/Conf/ConfOnePager.pdf.
Policy is one of the most important issues facing farmers today, but often the most difficult to digest. Jacqui Fatka has a passion to decode the often difficult world of agricultural policy into terms understandable for today's ag players.
Fatka joined the Farm Progress team as E-Content Editor in August 2003 after graduating from Iowa State University. Prior to full-time employment with Farm Progress, she interned at Wallaces Farmer magazine, Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley's press office and the Iowa Pork Producers Association and freelanced for National Hog Farmer. She also worked as a public relations consultant with Iowa Industries for the Future, an effort to bring together major players in the biorenewables industry.
Currently Fatka is a staff editor at a sister publication, Feedstuffs. For Farm Futures she regularly tells the story of ongoing agricultural policy changes. Her byline can also be found on management profiles.
Fatka grew up on a grain and livestock farm near Atlantic, Iowa. She currently lives in central Ohio with her husband Eric.
Powered by iNet Solutions Group ©2011 All Rights Reserved.