Farm Futures
   Search Site:  Search Site Wednesday, April 16, 2014 | Bookmark This Site   
Skip Navigation Links
Farm Futures NOW!
Magazine Online
RSS News
About Us

Western Dairies Face More Lawsuits

Defending Agriculture

Environmentalists at odds with manure handling at large farms

Published on: March 19, 2013

According to Capital Press, several Washington State dairies have been sued for violation of environmental laws and the "…threatened fines that could total as much as $550 million and put the dairies out of business…"

On February 14, 2013, lawyers from Seattle, Washington and the Center for Food Safety in Washington, D.C. charged the family dairies with polluting groundwater in the lower Yakima Valley.

A review of the complaint filed by the Community Association for Restoration of the Environment, Inc. and the Center for Food Safety, Inc. demonstrates the ongoing opposition by environmental groups against concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) in the United States. These lawsuits, where fines of $37,500 per day are sought, constitute a major threat against animal agriculture.

The environmental groups charge that the Cow Palace Dairy has 6,840 milking cows, 1,700 dry cows and approximately 3,000 calves and claim almost 10,000 animals are confined at the dairy. They claim the dairy produces more than 188,570 tons of manure annually and that the manure is stored in nine lagoons and applied on farm fields. Allegedly, the manure lagoons are located above an aquifer which serves as a domestic water supply.

The suit claim the lagoons are leaking as much as 8.6 million gallons annually, but the groups have no proof of such leakage. The plaintiffs claim they obtain their drinking water from aquifers which run under the dairy and the aquifers have been contaminated with nitrates, phosphorus, hormones, and antibiotics. As a result, the water is unsafe to drink.

These environmental plaintiffs claim the dairy is violating the Solid Waste Disposal Act, the Emergency planning and Right to Know Act, and the Comprehensive Environmental Response Act otherwise known as Superfund. They claim that Cow Palace Dairy "employs improper manure management practices that constitute the open dumping of solid waste in violation of the Solid Waste Act."

The complaint seeks injunctive relief requiring the Cow Palace Dairy to modify its handling, storage, treatment, transportation, and disposal of solid and hazardous waste.

It will probably come as a surprise to some of you that cow manure is considered a hazardous waste.

Solid waste?

The question arises as to whether cow manure, cow urine and water constitute a solid waste. The solid waste charge was made against poultry producers in an Oklahoma case in 2009. Chicken manure has phosphorus levels that generally are 3.5 times higher than those in cattle manure. A judge in the poultry cases found that, and presumably in dairy, manure is not a solid waste under EPA's Solid Waste Act.

The court understood in the poultry cases that poultry litter is not being "discarded, thrown away, or abandoned." Presumably the same reasoning will apply in the Washington dairy cases.

If manure is not abandoned, then it is not a waste!  If it is a nutrient or soil conditioner then the manure is not a waste.

Nevertheless, the plaintiffs claim they are going to regulate manure spreading because the environmental contamination it causes includes widespread soil and groundwater contamination and could harm them and their families' health.

In addition to this set of charges, the plaintiffs complain that a dairy "…emits hazardous pollutants, including but not limited to ammonia." The complaint says these hazardous pollutants from the dairy are known to have "negative impacts" on human health.

Plaintiff Center for Food Safety claims that Cow Palace Dairy is violating two environmental reporting statutes mentioned above. It claims that the dairy emits more than 100 lbs. of ammonia per day and that this could cause an emergency which must be reported to appropriate authorities.

This case and others brought against CAFOs indicate the continuing legal actions animal agriculture faces. The complaint says that Cow Palace Dairy contaminates and continues to contaminate groundwater to the extent that the water is hazardous to drink. It also claims that the dairy's practices of handling and storing manure present "an eminent and substantial endangerment to public health and/or the environment." The complaint also says that the Cow Palace Dairy constitutes an "open dump" under the EPA Solid Waste Act.

If the environmental groups are successful in convincing a court of these charges, then every CAFO in America will find itself the subject of environmentalists' lawsuits and substantial legal costs!

Post Tags:

Add Comment
  1. Anonymous says:

    The second part I wanted to point out also is how this lawsuit isn't going anywhere forward other then forcing some big dairies to change their practices. #1 environmentalist can't prove the nitrates in the water are from the dairies. Eastern washington for whatever reason (it's some of the richest soil in the world due the historical makeup) but we have high nitrates in the water ALL OVER. Is it natural or is it due to farmers using fertilizer.. *shrug* But do dairies want to risk it or just use the money to "fix" a problem that might not go away. Environmentalist have lots of time and money. So most of the dairies will "fix" the problem.. Ie the cow palace is building a pipe to another dairy that has a Anerobic digester down the road. But the funniest part is the cow palace is one of the cleanest dairies in the area but they are a 7000 cow dairy and it makes for a target.. But high nitrates make me laugh. Is there leaching, uh yeah sure, but how bad is the question. I just think of this packed valley with all the private house septic tanks. how much are THEY leaching?? tw

  2. Anonymous says:

    This case to me is more of a wake up call to farming in general. Whether you like it or not farming is going to have to change either by governmental intervention or lawsuits or just cost analysis. #1 people don't like a lot of common practices in farming because they don't understand them or don't care to understand them. #2 It's expensive to have fertilizer and chemicals drifting away or washing down the stream. It's bad for the environment and honestly just BAD business. I mean if you have an extra couple of grand to wash away i'll give you my address. It's time to stop being "old and stubborn" farmers and pay a little more to conscious of what we are doing. The funny thing is.. Once we perfect the new systems they aren't usually anymore expensive and usually cheaper to farm that way. Tw

  3. Anonymous says:

    It's about time!

  4. Anonymous says: